BLUEDONKEYS
BlueDonkeys.com - A big-tent website serving all Democrats in Clark County
Vaccinate, please
Science for vaccination is strong. 17th LD State Representative Vicki Kraft is not so strong. She wants to deny vaccinations. The Columbian published a chart of local legislators' priorities (Jan 08, 2020) and Rep Kraft offered the following: "Protect parents' rights regarding sex education and vaccinations". That means allow no education and no vaccinations. Here's a political cartoon that also was published in The Columbian (01/12/20):
Trump lies!
[Note: He just passed 16,00 lies. Ed.]
All people make mistakes, some people just can't seem to get their information, some people can't tell the truth. Trump lies about pretty much everything. He may not lie about what he's going to do, like banning Muslims, or retracting water quality rules, but he definitely lies about the reasons for doing so. He lies because he believes his own trumped-up statements. And those statements - lies - tend to make him look good. He's lied over 15,000 times while in office. It's so bad, that it's impossible to believe anything he says. It is one appalling aspect of this administration. - LINK
All people make mistakes, some people just can't seem to get their information, some people can't tell the truth. Trump lies about pretty much everything. He may not lie about what he's going to do, like banning Muslims, or retracting water quality rules, but he definitely lies about the reasons for doing so. He lies because he believes his own trumped-up statements. And those statements - lies - tend to make him look good. He's lied over 15,000 times while in office. It's so bad, that it's impossible to believe anything he says. It is one appalling aspect of this administration. - LINK
TAD - got it?
TAD or Trump Anxiety Disorder, is affecting the country. Chances are you have it. Symptoms include “increased worry, obsessive thought patterns, muscle tension and obsessive preoccupation with the news.” Not sleeping as well, snapping at your spouse without reason? It's that disturbing undercurrent in your psyche that results from having a malignant narcissistic president that despises and derides virtually everybody in the country but mostly Democrats - a president that imprisons immigrant children, sows racial and religious discontent, lies and lies and lies, has lying cronies, destroys air, water and climate, and on and on.
It's that feeling of holding your breath in anticipation of something, anything making a difference and ridding the US of this horribly decimating influence. It's a documented condition - LINK.
It's that feeling of holding your breath in anticipation of something, anything making a difference and ridding the US of this horribly decimating influence. It's a documented condition - LINK.
New, different March Prez ballots
We're having a Primary Election on Tuesday March 10, 2020 to name your selection for US President. . It's a different kind of ballot than usual - it's Party (Democrat or Republican) oriented. You don't have to declare your Party, but you do have to select which Party you support in this election. This will be confusing, or irritating, or perhaps gratifying, to some people. The point is that one should vote in this election to support their candidate.
Selecting the Democratic page and then picking your candidate from the list of 13 Democrats will supply the WA State Democratic party with a preference count for your candidate throughout the State. From that count in comparison with all the other candidates, the number of Delegates for that candidate will b calculated. Those delegates who subsequently support the candidate going forward to the National Convention (Milwaukee WI, July 12, 2020) will be selected initially at local Legislative District Caucuses on March 30. The final selection of the Democratic nominee will be made at the National Convention in Milwaukee by delegate vote.
The Republican candidate is the Current Occupant of the White House.
The Columbian reported on this ballot process - LINK.
So, plan on seeing a little different ballot, and plan on showing your Party preference, and plan on Voting your choice for new President!
Selecting the Democratic page and then picking your candidate from the list of 13 Democrats will supply the WA State Democratic party with a preference count for your candidate throughout the State. From that count in comparison with all the other candidates, the number of Delegates for that candidate will b calculated. Those delegates who subsequently support the candidate going forward to the National Convention (Milwaukee WI, July 12, 2020) will be selected initially at local Legislative District Caucuses on March 30. The final selection of the Democratic nominee will be made at the National Convention in Milwaukee by delegate vote.
The Republican candidate is the Current Occupant of the White House.
The Columbian reported on this ballot process - LINK.
So, plan on seeing a little different ballot, and plan on showing your Party preference, and plan on Voting your choice for new President!
Happy New Year(?)
,Saying "Happy New Year" to another is an act of wishing them a successful life for the upcoming months. Some are not comfortable with the new year however, for what it brings, and brings so fast. The entire year seems to be dominated by the specter of a Trump re-election. Ye gods! That must not happen.
There are so many issues with the Trump presidency:
Climate change ignorance.Air and water quality destruction.
Engendering racial and religious bias and violence.
Destruction checks and balances between branches of government.
Impeachment by the House and the very questionable Senate trial.
Escalation of the national debt (Our own Greg Jayne, Editorial Editor for The Columbian, offers a very simple, understandable primer on the n ational debt - LINK)
Impetuous killing of the Iranian General Qassem Soleimani (Read Trump's 'logic' - LINK)
That's a broad, but incomplete list.
The Democratic presidential field has some great people in it - perhaps no one of them is incapable of being at least moderately successful, and certainly better than Trump. But voters are looking for someone with a little soul, a little gravitas and lots of brains - like Obama, or a Kennedy. Somebody they can get behind. But the other consideration, which is almost counter to the popularity question is: "Can they beat Trump?". If we find popularity in a woman or a person of color, can the country find their way to voting them in over the Trump incumbent? After all, it is surmised that Trump's rise and elect-ability was in backlash to a black man in the White House.
The action needed is to get out the talk about the election; to get the positivity of the Democratic candidates focused against the horrible, awful issues connected with the Republicans and Trump. Everyone has to be a spokesperson for the Democratic principles engendered by the party and the candidates, and ultimately the nominee.
The biggest area of disagreement on the campaign trail is the way health care should be handled going forward. What we used to call "Socialized medicine" is always the goal to achieve - like every other first world nation on the planet. But do we get there tomorrow or over a reasonable time, or a very long time? From the treatment of ACA, or Obamacare, by the Republicans it seems obvious that we as a country are not unified on how or what should happen. The R's wanted to repeal ACA. It seems there are too many people selling insurance, limiting insurance, making and selling prescription drugs that are making big bucks in the health industry that are unwilling to give up their positions, and dollars, even though they are bilking the populace.
Okay, so consider the long term approach - and then wonder if due to the resistance, can medicare for all ever be accomplished? After all, ACA was supposed to be the first rung of a ladder that we'd climb with successively built rungs to accomplish medicare for all (single payer) eventually.
That approach is juxtaposed against the plan to implement slam bang in 2021, and just jump right to the ultimate end. But people are expressing fear with that - that they'll lose their doctor, their insurance, their health care altogether. Change, especially big change, is scary. And with the R's pushing back so hard it's possible the whole process would get stymied anyway. It's necessary for the country to have a real goal and that goal be a common one. These things come from the top - like Kennedy saying, "We're going to the moon." We need a real leader who cares about the country and the future and can do things like demand a halt to fossil fuel consumption, not call for the resurrection of coal. Get trump out, get out the vote.
There are so many issues with the Trump presidency:
Climate change ignorance.Air and water quality destruction.
Engendering racial and religious bias and violence.
Destruction checks and balances between branches of government.
Impeachment by the House and the very questionable Senate trial.
Escalation of the national debt (Our own Greg Jayne, Editorial Editor for The Columbian, offers a very simple, understandable primer on the n ational debt - LINK)
Impetuous killing of the Iranian General Qassem Soleimani (Read Trump's 'logic' - LINK)
That's a broad, but incomplete list.
The Democratic presidential field has some great people in it - perhaps no one of them is incapable of being at least moderately successful, and certainly better than Trump. But voters are looking for someone with a little soul, a little gravitas and lots of brains - like Obama, or a Kennedy. Somebody they can get behind. But the other consideration, which is almost counter to the popularity question is: "Can they beat Trump?". If we find popularity in a woman or a person of color, can the country find their way to voting them in over the Trump incumbent? After all, it is surmised that Trump's rise and elect-ability was in backlash to a black man in the White House.
The action needed is to get out the talk about the election; to get the positivity of the Democratic candidates focused against the horrible, awful issues connected with the Republicans and Trump. Everyone has to be a spokesperson for the Democratic principles engendered by the party and the candidates, and ultimately the nominee.
The biggest area of disagreement on the campaign trail is the way health care should be handled going forward. What we used to call "Socialized medicine" is always the goal to achieve - like every other first world nation on the planet. But do we get there tomorrow or over a reasonable time, or a very long time? From the treatment of ACA, or Obamacare, by the Republicans it seems obvious that we as a country are not unified on how or what should happen. The R's wanted to repeal ACA. It seems there are too many people selling insurance, limiting insurance, making and selling prescription drugs that are making big bucks in the health industry that are unwilling to give up their positions, and dollars, even though they are bilking the populace.
Okay, so consider the long term approach - and then wonder if due to the resistance, can medicare for all ever be accomplished? After all, ACA was supposed to be the first rung of a ladder that we'd climb with successively built rungs to accomplish medicare for all (single payer) eventually.
That approach is juxtaposed against the plan to implement slam bang in 2021, and just jump right to the ultimate end. But people are expressing fear with that - that they'll lose their doctor, their insurance, their health care altogether. Change, especially big change, is scary. And with the R's pushing back so hard it's possible the whole process would get stymied anyway. It's necessary for the country to have a real goal and that goal be a common one. These things come from the top - like Kennedy saying, "We're going to the moon." We need a real leader who cares about the country and the future and can do things like demand a halt to fossil fuel consumption, not call for the resurrection of coal. Get trump out, get out the vote.
Impeachment facts vs. emotions
Dana Milbank of tthe Washington Post contrasts the Democrat's impeachment facts versus the Rep[ublican's emotional blather and does, sadly, show that many people who are trumpian will be able to "shrug" off the impeachment as "Oh, well" and give it no merit. LINK
Truly the facts describe a constitutional violation and objective people can find impeachment clearly valid given the factual substance. The cult of Trump can say "So what".. The tenor, or undercurrent(perhaps by wishful thinkinking pundits) is that some Republican Senators when faced with the evidence and their Oath of Office, may find their moral feet and side with impechment.
Others are finding that the "IMPEACHED" label does emotionally cause them to diminish the President's words and action: he's a little more discountable becuase of the detrimental quality of the impeachment label. Let's hope so!
Truly the facts describe a constitutional violation and objective people can find impeachment clearly valid given the factual substance. The cult of Trump can say "So what".. The tenor, or undercurrent(perhaps by wishful thinkinking pundits) is that some Republican Senators when faced with the evidence and their Oath of Office, may find their moral feet and side with impechment.
Others are finding that the "IMPEACHED" label does emotionally cause them to diminish the President's words and action: he's a little more discountable becuase of the detrimental quality of the impeachment label. Let's hope so!
Christmas
The chipmunk's song says "Christmas comes but once a year". Many would say "Whew, once a year is plenty. It's a lot of work" It is a lot of work and the movies depict the often negative interactions between family members. So there's trauma and anxiety associated with such a big holiday. But when it's all settled around midnight Christmas Eve, it's pretty warm and comfortsable. It's a job well done and a time to come together and give a little something to a loved one. So whether you're into Christmas for the celebration of the birth of Christ or just involved in the pagan aspects of St Nick and decorated trees and a yule log, find the moments of relaxation, enjoy it, and wish yourself and your family and pals a very "Merry Christmas".
Unbelievable Senate
The Democratic-majority House of Representatives comported themselves with grace, thoroughness, and speed. They brought Trump to a state of
Impeachment based on facts, in spite of the President preventing witnesses to testify and himself offering no defense. As many Congressman point out in interviews, they did their constitutional duty.
The Republican-majority Senate is, by the Constitution, required to provide a trial of the President on the Impeachment charges. A trial is, by definition, a fair and honest discourse by prosecutors and defenders using facts to make a case for the defendant's guilt or innocence. The jury in an Impeachment trial is the body of Senators using a two-thirds vote to remove the President from office.
The Senators, Republican Senators, that is, have thrown up consistent roadblocks and statements that defy any form of fair proceedings. McConnell, majority leader, said on Fox News he and the Senate would "coordinate with the President's lawyers". There is nothing fair about having the jury work with the defense's attorneys. Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post pulls together several bewildering comments from the Senate. LINK.
In the meantime Speaker Pelosi is not formally releasing the Articles of Impeachment until she can get some satisfaction that the Senate rules will provide a fair trial.
Some had hopes that a few Republican Senators will truly respect their Oath of Office and consider the Constitutional transgressions by Trump with care and deliberation. Let's keep hoping that will be so.
Impeachment based on facts, in spite of the President preventing witnesses to testify and himself offering no defense. As many Congressman point out in interviews, they did their constitutional duty.
The Republican-majority Senate is, by the Constitution, required to provide a trial of the President on the Impeachment charges. A trial is, by definition, a fair and honest discourse by prosecutors and defenders using facts to make a case for the defendant's guilt or innocence. The jury in an Impeachment trial is the body of Senators using a two-thirds vote to remove the President from office.
The Senators, Republican Senators, that is, have thrown up consistent roadblocks and statements that defy any form of fair proceedings. McConnell, majority leader, said on Fox News he and the Senate would "coordinate with the President's lawyers". There is nothing fair about having the jury work with the defense's attorneys. Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post pulls together several bewildering comments from the Senate. LINK.
In the meantime Speaker Pelosi is not formally releasing the Articles of Impeachment until she can get some satisfaction that the Senate rules will provide a fair trial.
Some had hopes that a few Republican Senators will truly respect their Oath of Office and consider the Constitutional transgressions by Trump with care and deliberation. Let's keep hoping that will be so.
Unbelievable R's
The Cult of Trump is strong and irresponsible - and lying, deceitful, and full of obfuscation. The Republican Party has clearly put themselves in the position of ignoring country, and totally absorbing politics and what politics can do for them. Sadly, the R's used to exhibit strong beliefs in morals and country, but no longer.
"Leaders" like Trump, Bill Barr, Mike Pompeo, and Mitch McConnell have lost their moral compasses. They say and do anything to further their agenda items of personal wealth; more wealth for the rich; no constraints for industry regarding employee rights, water and air quality; education for the masses; women's equality and rights; rights of brown and black people, especially immigrants, and on and on.
Now in the face of impeachment they push back with irrational and smokescreen rhetoric that belies belief. Any trust in any R is gone and will be a long time being regained.
McConnell said after the impeachment vote that the impeachment set a “toxic new precedent that will echo well into the future.” (LINK.) Odd. that's the same phrase used in the statements FOR impeachment by the witnesses - that Trump's bad behavior sets a precedent for the future that destroys the Constitution and democracy.
There is clear doubt that the Senate can or will run a fair trial, which is, of course, their Constitutional duty. Speaker Pelosi appears to have some leverage as to when she releases the Article of Impeachment to the Senate - until the rules and leaders of the trail are made clear and agreed upon. But in the meantime the R's scream fraud and that the Speaker is not releasing the Articles because they are illegal or useless. or invalid.
We are witnessing a clear, ugly downward turn in America's morality that can only be turned by getting Trump out of office - and even then it will be a long uphill battle to get back to a true moral footing where County First is really the direction.
"Leaders" like Trump, Bill Barr, Mike Pompeo, and Mitch McConnell have lost their moral compasses. They say and do anything to further their agenda items of personal wealth; more wealth for the rich; no constraints for industry regarding employee rights, water and air quality; education for the masses; women's equality and rights; rights of brown and black people, especially immigrants, and on and on.
Now in the face of impeachment they push back with irrational and smokescreen rhetoric that belies belief. Any trust in any R is gone and will be a long time being regained.
McConnell said after the impeachment vote that the impeachment set a “toxic new precedent that will echo well into the future.” (LINK.) Odd. that's the same phrase used in the statements FOR impeachment by the witnesses - that Trump's bad behavior sets a precedent for the future that destroys the Constitution and democracy.
There is clear doubt that the Senate can or will run a fair trial, which is, of course, their Constitutional duty. Speaker Pelosi appears to have some leverage as to when she releases the Article of Impeachment to the Senate - until the rules and leaders of the trail are made clear and agreed upon. But in the meantime the R's scream fraud and that the Speaker is not releasing the Articles because they are illegal or useless. or invalid.
We are witnessing a clear, ugly downward turn in America's morality that can only be turned by getting Trump out of office - and even then it will be a long uphill battle to get back to a true moral footing where County First is really the direction.
Impeached
Dec 18, 2019. The 45th President of the United States was impeached on 2 counts at 8:00 PM Wednesday December 18, 2019. The counts are dscribed in the New York Times as follows:
"The first article charges him with abuse of power for pressuring Ukraine to assist him in his re-election campaign by damaging Democratic rivals. The second article charges him with obstruction of Congress for blocking testimony and refusing to provide documents in response to House subpoenas in the impeachment inquiry." LINK
A rally in Vancouver last night on the eve of the vote House impeachment vote drew about 600 impeachment supporters to Esther Short
Park. The article on the rally in The Columbian described Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler's view of the impeachment as follows:
"Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Battle Ground, announced last week that she planned to vote against both articles, citing a “rushed timeline” by Democratic leadership that prevented Congress from hearing testimony from firsthand witnesses in the president’s inner circle.
“House committee chairs were unwilling to press the subpoenas on witnesses who could have provided firsthand accounts of the president’s actions, and instead relied on witnesses who’d never even met the president, could only provide secondhand testimony, and offered assumptions based on what they say they heard, Herrera Beutler said in a written statement Friday." LINK
This is deceitful on the Congresswoman's part. The reason "firsthand" witnesses were not interviewed is because Trump prevented them from testifying, which is the very reason for the second Article of Impeachment.
The next step will be a trial by the Senate to determine whether Trump will be removed from office. House Majority leader Mitch "Moscow" McConnell has already stated on Fox news that the Senate will work in lockstep with the White House, which, of course, flies in the face of any fair trial. LINK
The Trump circus will continue.
"The first article charges him with abuse of power for pressuring Ukraine to assist him in his re-election campaign by damaging Democratic rivals. The second article charges him with obstruction of Congress for blocking testimony and refusing to provide documents in response to House subpoenas in the impeachment inquiry." LINK
A rally in Vancouver last night on the eve of the vote House impeachment vote drew about 600 impeachment supporters to Esther Short
Park. The article on the rally in The Columbian described Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler's view of the impeachment as follows:
"Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Battle Ground, announced last week that she planned to vote against both articles, citing a “rushed timeline” by Democratic leadership that prevented Congress from hearing testimony from firsthand witnesses in the president’s inner circle.
“House committee chairs were unwilling to press the subpoenas on witnesses who could have provided firsthand accounts of the president’s actions, and instead relied on witnesses who’d never even met the president, could only provide secondhand testimony, and offered assumptions based on what they say they heard, Herrera Beutler said in a written statement Friday." LINK
This is deceitful on the Congresswoman's part. The reason "firsthand" witnesses were not interviewed is because Trump prevented them from testifying, which is the very reason for the second Article of Impeachment.
The next step will be a trial by the Senate to determine whether Trump will be removed from office. House Majority leader Mitch "Moscow" McConnell has already stated on Fox news that the Senate will work in lockstep with the White House, which, of course, flies in the face of any fair trial. LINK
The Trump circus will continue.
Impeachment summary
Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post pulls together simply the reasons for the current impeachment of Trump - and deservedly. The Senate will do whatever it does for whatever reasons it can drum up. Trump will be impeached this week and he deserves it. It's imperative that the work be done by every thinking individual to elect someone other than Trump. LINK
Facts?!
Dana Milbank of the Washington Post (12/10/19) put together the impeachment facts offered by the Democrats and the non-facts offered by the R's. It's very clear from the article, or from the hearings if you've been watching them, that the Dems are following their Constitutional conscience and the R's are following the Cult of Trump. At some point the lies of the R's and their obfuscation will catch up to them.
The facts offered by the Democrats in this impeachment are for a particular instance of Trump's violation of the Constitution. There are numerous others which may not show such a clear-cut case, but there are others. And there are hints of more where the true facts are concealed. As Nancy Pelosi said, "All roads lead to Putin". LINK
The facts offered by the Democrats in this impeachment are for a particular instance of Trump's violation of the Constitution. There are numerous others which may not show such a clear-cut case, but there are others. And there are hints of more where the true facts are concealed. As Nancy Pelosi said, "All roads lead to Putin". LINK
It's happening!
The House Judiciary Committee has prepared two articles of impeachment on President Donald J. Trump and announced them to the world. They will be brought before the full House and voted on next week.Assuming that vote passes then the impeachemetn will be official and the trial will go to the Senate to decide whether Trtump should be removed from office.
The articles are, 1) Trump has abused the powers of the the Presidency by soliciting a foreign power to assist in the 2020 election via finding or implying dirt on the Bidens in return for Ukraine being released to Ukraine, ad 2) obstructing Congress in an investigation by refusing subpoenas on witnesses.
The facts are clear especially via the president's release of the notes of the phone call to Ukraine's President Zelensky ands via numerous informed witnesses that did testify. Similarly the obstruction Article is unarguable.
The Democrats reason, logically, that the "high crimes and misdemeanors" are clear and if not acted upon via House impeachment would be negligence of Constitutional duty by the House. The Republicans profess that the process is illegitimate or flawed, or that the Presidents actions are okay for him to do. Poppycock! If this President is allowed to get away with these acts, he and any future president can behave similarly without any control by Congress, - which is the checks and balance system designed into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers.
What will the Senate d? Can enough Republican Senators find their feet and discover their Oath of Office to uphold the Constitution and vote Trump out? Let's hope so. Certainly, if the situation was reversed, i.e., Pres Bill Clinton lying over a brief sexual encounter, the R's would, and did, show up with pitchforks and impeach. In Clinton's case the Senators did not find his offense significant enough to cause his removal. In this case the facts are very clear. n fact Trump had his lawyer, Giuliani, in Ukraine last week during the impeachment hearings to continue pressuring Ukrainians to offer accusations against the Bidens. Trump is guilty 10 times over.
And then there's Bill Barr, the highest lawman in the land. Barr is so involved in the Cult of Trump that he lies and deceives to protect Trump. Barr held up distribution of the damning Mueller Report and even put out a deceitful, misleading four-page memo drawing incorrect conclusions from the Report, and using it to demonstrate Trump's innocence. Now Barr is arguing against his own people to say that the FBI is disingenuous and people reporting on the Russia 2016 election interference are misguided at least. The country has slipped into rampant corruption which the Republicans appear to think is okay.
The articles are, 1) Trump has abused the powers of the the Presidency by soliciting a foreign power to assist in the 2020 election via finding or implying dirt on the Bidens in return for Ukraine being released to Ukraine, ad 2) obstructing Congress in an investigation by refusing subpoenas on witnesses.
The facts are clear especially via the president's release of the notes of the phone call to Ukraine's President Zelensky ands via numerous informed witnesses that did testify. Similarly the obstruction Article is unarguable.
The Democrats reason, logically, that the "high crimes and misdemeanors" are clear and if not acted upon via House impeachment would be negligence of Constitutional duty by the House. The Republicans profess that the process is illegitimate or flawed, or that the Presidents actions are okay for him to do. Poppycock! If this President is allowed to get away with these acts, he and any future president can behave similarly without any control by Congress, - which is the checks and balance system designed into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers.
What will the Senate d? Can enough Republican Senators find their feet and discover their Oath of Office to uphold the Constitution and vote Trump out? Let's hope so. Certainly, if the situation was reversed, i.e., Pres Bill Clinton lying over a brief sexual encounter, the R's would, and did, show up with pitchforks and impeach. In Clinton's case the Senators did not find his offense significant enough to cause his removal. In this case the facts are very clear. n fact Trump had his lawyer, Giuliani, in Ukraine last week during the impeachment hearings to continue pressuring Ukrainians to offer accusations against the Bidens. Trump is guilty 10 times over.
And then there's Bill Barr, the highest lawman in the land. Barr is so involved in the Cult of Trump that he lies and deceives to protect Trump. Barr held up distribution of the damning Mueller Report and even put out a deceitful, misleading four-page memo drawing incorrect conclusions from the Report, and using it to demonstrate Trump's innocence. Now Barr is arguing against his own people to say that the FBI is disingenuous and people reporting on the Russia 2016 election interference are misguided at least. The country has slipped into rampant corruption which the Republicans appear to think is okay.
Impeachment cause plain
The constitutional violations that deserve impeachment are plain. There's the bribery phone call, the illegal hold-up of congressionally approved funds for Ukraine. and the obstruction of justice failure to respond to respond to Congressional subpoena. Plain for all to see, except the R's.
Eugene Robinson (11/26/19 Washington Post) commends the stalwart federal employees who have come forward to provide stinging, truthful testimony and statements concerning Trumps disrespect of the law. He does ask why it took them so long. Perhaps it's the crack in the dam that being s to split, and int his case we hope the split and the spill are logarithmic. LINK
Mike Pompeo - Have you been watching him in interviews? - is a concealer and a liar. he was on the damning phone call between Trump and Zelensky but doesn't admit it. Testimony of Fiona Hill and Gordon Sondland clearly implicates Pompeo in the entire quid pro quo enterprise. And Pompeo won't stand up for his State Department people like Marie Yovanovitch. Jennifer Rubin (Washington Post 11/20/19) list facts of Pompeo's involvement and describes the need for Pompeo to testify. LINK.
Eugene Robinson (11/26/19 Washington Post) commends the stalwart federal employees who have come forward to provide stinging, truthful testimony and statements concerning Trumps disrespect of the law. He does ask why it took them so long. Perhaps it's the crack in the dam that being s to split, and int his case we hope the split and the spill are logarithmic. LINK
Mike Pompeo - Have you been watching him in interviews? - is a concealer and a liar. he was on the damning phone call between Trump and Zelensky but doesn't admit it. Testimony of Fiona Hill and Gordon Sondland clearly implicates Pompeo in the entire quid pro quo enterprise. And Pompeo won't stand up for his State Department people like Marie Yovanovitch. Jennifer Rubin (Washington Post 11/20/19) list facts of Pompeo's involvement and describes the need for Pompeo to testify. LINK.
Inexplicable GOP response
Trump's "defenders would rather walk through fire in gasoline-soaked underwear than admit the truth of his malfeasance", says Leonard Pitts of the Miami Herald (11/22/19) - LINK. It's unbelievable. They get what they want of their agenda by clinging to him. And to admit he's wrong now would mean their strident defense of him to date has been wrong and thereby the GOP would be wrong - so they are defending themselves.
The evidence is in - from Gordon Sondland who says "everybody was in the loop", and there "was a quid pro quo". Fiona Hill points out that Ukraine did not tamper with the 2016 elections, Russia did. And the Senators have been schooled in that fact by DOD. LINK
It's really important from legal and constitutional points of view that Trump be impeached by the House and tried and removed from office by the Senate. He is truly horrible and has brought out the worst in his supporters - white nationalism - and his party, and undone any positive directions the country was taking - air & water pollution, climate change, Iran nuclear, Syria, etc. Continuation of the path the US is on, with or without Trump, will see the end of this country as it was designed and bring about continued division, hatred, toxicity (physical and political), and minimized world standing. So many instances have occurred where Trump has thrown the game to Putin - election hacking, Syria and the Kurds, Ukraine support, and sanctions. If he's not in bed with Putin, he's just incredibly naive [stupid]. The country is dying here and it feels like an inexorable slide to and new and very ugly paradigm.
The evidence is in - from Gordon Sondland who says "everybody was in the loop", and there "was a quid pro quo". Fiona Hill points out that Ukraine did not tamper with the 2016 elections, Russia did. And the Senators have been schooled in that fact by DOD. LINK
It's really important from legal and constitutional points of view that Trump be impeached by the House and tried and removed from office by the Senate. He is truly horrible and has brought out the worst in his supporters - white nationalism - and his party, and undone any positive directions the country was taking - air & water pollution, climate change, Iran nuclear, Syria, etc. Continuation of the path the US is on, with or without Trump, will see the end of this country as it was designed and bring about continued division, hatred, toxicity (physical and political), and minimized world standing. So many instances have occurred where Trump has thrown the game to Putin - election hacking, Syria and the Kurds, Ukraine support, and sanctions. If he's not in bed with Putin, he's just incredibly naive [stupid]. The country is dying here and it feels like an inexorable slide to and new and very ugly paradigm.
Bad Beutler
Congresswoman Jaime Beutler misrepresents [lies] about the facts of the current Trump impeachment inquiry. She spouts the Republican party line [lie] about the proceedings. She says Democratic leaders are holding private meetings in some of the Capitol’s most secretive rooms, are held. That is a misrepresentation.. The initial interviews by the House Intelligence Committee with witnesses are held in the SCIF, a secure conference room in the Capitol basement designed to prevent spying an intrusion and created for this purpose. The interviewing committee is strictly BI-partisan comprised of Democrats and Republicans. Information received may be classified, but if not is released the next day, of late. Link.
More impeachment info -
The Columbian Opinion Editor, Greg Jayne, recently asked, "Is this the last gasp of the GOP?". He reached out to local Republican office holders for their opinions on Trump, and in an unusual way - he promised them anonymity for honesty. They all expressed their dislike of Trump. They responded that , "It's difficult to be a Republican in the Trump era", and "Integrity, compassion" are replaced with "self-aggrandizement". Will it end the R's? Doubtful, but the result of standing up for the man when GOP electeds know in their hearts that he is illegal and awful will not fail to leave a significant blot on the Republican Party in the minds of voters. LINK.
Here's a nifty little summary of the impeachment progress so far. It's from NPR by Domenico Montanaro. It covers the facts pretty well and offers some innuendoes. The whistle-blower has become unnecessary at this point because all of the suspect activities he/she pointed out have been borne out by solid testimony from solid witnesses. Three of those witnesses are scheduled to reiterate their testimony via more bi-partisan questioning in a televised public forum next week. LINK.
Recall the cries that the interviews were not bipartisan? And the seeming invasion of the secure testimony room by House Republicans? All theater! In all interview cases, the House Intelligence Committee is bipartisan consisting of 13 D's and 9 R's (now 10 R's) and questions are expected from all members. Some of the people who engaged in the secure room break-in were already members who decided the show was more important than attending.
The GOP demanded a vote by the House to make 'official' the impeachment process was indeed supported by a House majority. This has not been needed previously and was deemed unnecessary this time, but the House Speaker called the vote anyway to placate the R's, and perhaps to comfirm the process' legitimacy to the public. The vote established a majority of the House wanted to proceed with impeachment, but now Trump has stated the process needs to be done in secret.
Dana Milbank of the Washington Post published on Nov 5 an account of Trump's lies at Trump's Lexington KY rally. It demonstrates nicely Trump's ability for outright lies when he is cornered. The scary part is that those lies are what his supporters hear on Fox News, and what they believe. LINK.
Can the Senate Republicans find their hearts and remember their Oath of Office sufficient to vote for removal of Trump. It's very clear that the Ukraine action by Trump to force their President to blast the Biden family for the sake of Trump's re-election is illegal and falls into "high crimes and misdemeanors". How does an elected official sworn to the Constitution find heart in siding with Trump's illegal activities? The Senate vote, when it comes in subsequent months, will be something to reckon with.
Here's a nifty little summary of the impeachment progress so far. It's from NPR by Domenico Montanaro. It covers the facts pretty well and offers some innuendoes. The whistle-blower has become unnecessary at this point because all of the suspect activities he/she pointed out have been borne out by solid testimony from solid witnesses. Three of those witnesses are scheduled to reiterate their testimony via more bi-partisan questioning in a televised public forum next week. LINK.
Recall the cries that the interviews were not bipartisan? And the seeming invasion of the secure testimony room by House Republicans? All theater! In all interview cases, the House Intelligence Committee is bipartisan consisting of 13 D's and 9 R's (now 10 R's) and questions are expected from all members. Some of the people who engaged in the secure room break-in were already members who decided the show was more important than attending.
The GOP demanded a vote by the House to make 'official' the impeachment process was indeed supported by a House majority. This has not been needed previously and was deemed unnecessary this time, but the House Speaker called the vote anyway to placate the R's, and perhaps to comfirm the process' legitimacy to the public. The vote established a majority of the House wanted to proceed with impeachment, but now Trump has stated the process needs to be done in secret.
Dana Milbank of the Washington Post published on Nov 5 an account of Trump's lies at Trump's Lexington KY rally. It demonstrates nicely Trump's ability for outright lies when he is cornered. The scary part is that those lies are what his supporters hear on Fox News, and what they believe. LINK.
Can the Senate Republicans find their hearts and remember their Oath of Office sufficient to vote for removal of Trump. It's very clear that the Ukraine action by Trump to force their President to blast the Biden family for the sake of Trump's re-election is illegal and falls into "high crimes and misdemeanors". How does an elected official sworn to the Constitution find heart in siding with Trump's illegal activities? The Senate vote, when it comes in subsequent months, will be something to reckon with.
You have a ballot, now VOTE!
NOTE: 11/04 - As of today, turnout is 14.5%. Shameful. That means about 250,000 eligible voters have not voted! Encourage your friends and relatives to VOTE...TODAY!
Mail-in voting - what could be more convenient? It's designed to make voting easier, more popular, and encourage greater turnout. Voting is a right for Americans. It's only been about 100 years that women could vote in the US. Thinking back to great historical societies, women were denied the right to vote in the Roman and Greek empires. Some countries have denied women's suffrage until recent days, like Saudi Arabia (2015) - LINK. Voting is a right; and it's a responsibility. Our government is by representation. Each citizen gets to vote for the person that reflects their values and will duly represent those values in the laws they enact. So VOTE in this local election for the kid's school board members and the council members of the local city councils.
The Columbian has made many recommendations for the local election. They are reiterated below. One exception is they chose Perkins over Bethany Rivard with a tip of the hat to her. Do consider Bethany Rivard as the best for Evergreen School Board Position 4. LINK.
From the Columbian:
"• Referendum Measure 88: Approved. [Failed]
• Initiative Measure 976: We strongly recommend a “no” vote. [Oops. This was voted down and it will be a problem. LINK.}
• Advisory votes 20-31: These votes are nonbinding and, therefore, a waste of time. We recommend that you ignore them.
• Senate Joint Resolution 8200: Approved. [Failed also]
• Clark County Council, Dist. 4: Gary Medvigy is the clear choice", says The Columbian. Vote for Adrian Cortes! [Medvigy won]
"• Vancouver City Council, Pos. 2: Erik Paulsen is the clear choice. [Paulsen Won]
• Vancouver City Council, Pos. 5: Ty Stober. [Stober Won]
• Vancouver City Council, Pos. 6: Sarah Fox. [Fox Won]
• Evergreen school board, Dist. 2: Rob Perkins. Bethany Rivard also is a strong candidate", says The Columbian. Vote Bethany Rivard! [Still hanging fire]
"• Evergreen school board, Dist. 4: Divya Jain. Rachael Rogers also is a worthy candidate. [Rogers Won]
• Vancouver school board, Pos. 1: Kyle Sproul. [Sproul Won]
• Vancouver school board, Pos. 4: Kathy Decker, although Lisa Messer is equally qualified. [Decker Won]
• Vancouver school board, Pos. 5: Tracie Barrows. Chris Lewis also is a strong candidate. [Barrows Won]
• Port of Vancouver commissioner, Dist. 3: Jack Burkman is the clear choice. [Burkman Won]
• City of Vancouver charter amendments: We recommend a “yes” vote on each of seven proposals."
City of Battle Ground Council Seat 2: Shane Bowman
City of Battle Ground Council Seat 3: Neil Butler
City of Battle Ground Council Seat 7: Phil Johnson
Washougal School Board (!): Jim Cooper [Cooper Won]
Camas-Washougal Port Commissioner: Cassi Marshall [Marszhall is winning]
There you have it. Now mark that ballot.
Mail-in voting - what could be more convenient? It's designed to make voting easier, more popular, and encourage greater turnout. Voting is a right for Americans. It's only been about 100 years that women could vote in the US. Thinking back to great historical societies, women were denied the right to vote in the Roman and Greek empires. Some countries have denied women's suffrage until recent days, like Saudi Arabia (2015) - LINK. Voting is a right; and it's a responsibility. Our government is by representation. Each citizen gets to vote for the person that reflects their values and will duly represent those values in the laws they enact. So VOTE in this local election for the kid's school board members and the council members of the local city councils.
The Columbian has made many recommendations for the local election. They are reiterated below. One exception is they chose Perkins over Bethany Rivard with a tip of the hat to her. Do consider Bethany Rivard as the best for Evergreen School Board Position 4. LINK.
From the Columbian:
"• Referendum Measure 88: Approved. [Failed]
• Initiative Measure 976: We strongly recommend a “no” vote. [Oops. This was voted down and it will be a problem. LINK.}
• Advisory votes 20-31: These votes are nonbinding and, therefore, a waste of time. We recommend that you ignore them.
• Senate Joint Resolution 8200: Approved. [Failed also]
• Clark County Council, Dist. 4: Gary Medvigy is the clear choice", says The Columbian. Vote for Adrian Cortes! [Medvigy won]
"• Vancouver City Council, Pos. 2: Erik Paulsen is the clear choice. [Paulsen Won]
• Vancouver City Council, Pos. 5: Ty Stober. [Stober Won]
• Vancouver City Council, Pos. 6: Sarah Fox. [Fox Won]
• Evergreen school board, Dist. 2: Rob Perkins. Bethany Rivard also is a strong candidate", says The Columbian. Vote Bethany Rivard! [Still hanging fire]
"• Evergreen school board, Dist. 4: Divya Jain. Rachael Rogers also is a worthy candidate. [Rogers Won]
• Vancouver school board, Pos. 1: Kyle Sproul. [Sproul Won]
• Vancouver school board, Pos. 4: Kathy Decker, although Lisa Messer is equally qualified. [Decker Won]
• Vancouver school board, Pos. 5: Tracie Barrows. Chris Lewis also is a strong candidate. [Barrows Won]
• Port of Vancouver commissioner, Dist. 3: Jack Burkman is the clear choice. [Burkman Won]
• City of Vancouver charter amendments: We recommend a “yes” vote on each of seven proposals."
City of Battle Ground Council Seat 2: Shane Bowman
City of Battle Ground Council Seat 3: Neil Butler
City of Battle Ground Council Seat 7: Phil Johnson
Washougal School Board (!): Jim Cooper [Cooper Won]
Camas-Washougal Port Commissioner: Cassi Marshall [Marszhall is winning]
There you have it. Now mark that ballot.
Herrera Beutler sandbags impeachment, et al
Long term party marionette Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler made noises recently as if she thought Trump's Ukraine dealings might be not alright, and that the impeachment process needed a vote to move ahead. The vote has been taken and JHB has settled on the word 'farce' to define the impeachment. LINK.
Lacamas Magazine did what started out to be a lovely article about Carolyn Long raising lots of money in her second bid to replace JHB. (Rumor has that Carolyn "in-it-for-the Long-run" Long will win in 2020.) he article started out so nicely but rapidly deteriorated into a most ugly, and untrue, response from JHB about Carolyn's health care plans. JHB insists on lying about Carolyn's plan. Carolyn is not for Medicare for all as a starting point. Health care plans modeled after other successful plans as exist in Canada, England, Mexico and so forth is the ultimate goal, but a step-wise approach using the existing ACA as a basis is needed. Herrera simply gins up her lies about taxes and expensive health care same as she did last cycle. LINK.
The Columbian wrote an excellent editorial on JHB regarding her stand on impeachment of Trump ripping JHB - "Herrera Beutler puts party ahead of country". She is in violation of her oath of office, and "her explanations on Facebook ad Twitter fly in the face of logic and common sense, promoting Republican talking points designed to sow discord and doubt among the voting public". Strong words and well deserved. LINK.
Lacamas Magazine did what started out to be a lovely article about Carolyn Long raising lots of money in her second bid to replace JHB. (Rumor has that Carolyn "in-it-for-the Long-run" Long will win in 2020.) he article started out so nicely but rapidly deteriorated into a most ugly, and untrue, response from JHB about Carolyn's health care plans. JHB insists on lying about Carolyn's plan. Carolyn is not for Medicare for all as a starting point. Health care plans modeled after other successful plans as exist in Canada, England, Mexico and so forth is the ultimate goal, but a step-wise approach using the existing ACA as a basis is needed. Herrera simply gins up her lies about taxes and expensive health care same as she did last cycle. LINK.
The Columbian wrote an excellent editorial on JHB regarding her stand on impeachment of Trump ripping JHB - "Herrera Beutler puts party ahead of country". She is in violation of her oath of office, and "her explanations on Facebook ad Twitter fly in the face of logic and common sense, promoting Republican talking points designed to sow discord and doubt among the voting public". Strong words and well deserved. LINK.
Trump continually yields to Russia
Certainly, Trump loves dictators, like Russia's Putin, North Korea;'s Kim Jong Un, and Turkey's Erodgan. He wants to be the dictator, the king, of America. He's a criminal, a narcissist, and a racist.
But there's a very odd tilt to too many of his actions and that is his repeated acquiescence to Russia. He held the beauty pageant there years before his election, he was on the verge of building a Tower in Russia in 2016, he dismisses evidence that Russia tampered with the 2016 election, and now he is giving the Kurds, Syria and, moreover, Ukraine to Russia. His world performance is a total sellout and puts the USA to shame and in direct contradiction of our previous principles.
Trumps yielding to Russia at every turn is a larger, more insurmountable problem that his lawlessness.
But there's a very odd tilt to too many of his actions and that is his repeated acquiescence to Russia. He held the beauty pageant there years before his election, he was on the verge of building a Tower in Russia in 2016, he dismisses evidence that Russia tampered with the 2016 election, and now he is giving the Kurds, Syria and, moreover, Ukraine to Russia. His world performance is a total sellout and puts the USA to shame and in direct contradiction of our previous principles.
Trumps yielding to Russia at every turn is a larger, more insurmountable problem that his lawlessness.
Local businessman does bad
Ken Fisher, billionaire owner of Fisher Investments in Camas, is reported to have made scurrilous and discriminatory remarks at a meeting of investment CEOs recently. His vocalizing was so bad that the pledge of secrecy was broken by three other attendees and the State of Michigan company removed some $600 million dollars of retirement investments. When confronted, Fisher first said these were typical remarks for him and he's never received complaints previously, but he ultimately apologized. Read The Columbian article- LINK
UPDATE #2 - The exodus is up to $1.7 Billion for Billionaire Ken Fisher's crude remarks. - LINK
UPDATE - Fallout from Ken Fisher's offensive remarks continues to plague him and his company. It may cost him a billion dollars in investments -LINK
UPDATE #2 - The exodus is up to $1.7 Billion for Billionaire Ken Fisher's crude remarks. - LINK
UPDATE - Fallout from Ken Fisher's offensive remarks continues to plague him and his company. It may cost him a billion dollars in investments -LINK
Impeachable? Yes!
Trump has done so many things that should be impeachable. Things like recommending Trump Doral for the G7, diverting supply planes to refuel adjacent to his failing resort in Scotland, never divesting of his businesses, covering up illegal campaign contributions, taking Trump foundation money for his campaign, to name a few.
But making this perfect call to Ukraine leader Volodomir Zelensky requesting smear data on Joe Biden, Trump's seemingly main political 2020 competitor, has been a nice easy item to pin him with, quid pro quo notwithstnding. What he asked of Zelensky is illegal and is enough to impeach on by itself. The trade aspect is clearly inferred with Trump's needing a "favor, though".
Then begins the cover-ups. There's the denials, the prevention of testimonies, the protestation that his office is exempt even fro investigation, and Giuliani, Sondland, firing Marie Yovanovitch, and the subsequent gas deal for fun and profit. The best denial is that his rights to due process are being ignored, or that the impeachment is an attempt to swing the 2020 election.
No matter & whatever, There's enough there to remove him from office and public opinion is at about 51% to impeach and remove him from office. Publiv opinion is the thing that will let impeachment happen. It does not appear that the Republicans will ever show any backbone and take country first as a their sworn oath and be anywhere close to honest about Trump's illegal doings and his insufficiency for office. One thing that got the attention of the R's is the kowtowing to Turkey's Erdogan and the abandonment to slaughter of our Kurdish allies in the overthrow of ISIS. A couple of R's have been vocal over that singular situation.
Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post had a few things to say about the "cowardice" of the GOP in being honest about Trump - LINK
But making this perfect call to Ukraine leader Volodomir Zelensky requesting smear data on Joe Biden, Trump's seemingly main political 2020 competitor, has been a nice easy item to pin him with, quid pro quo notwithstnding. What he asked of Zelensky is illegal and is enough to impeach on by itself. The trade aspect is clearly inferred with Trump's needing a "favor, though".
Then begins the cover-ups. There's the denials, the prevention of testimonies, the protestation that his office is exempt even fro investigation, and Giuliani, Sondland, firing Marie Yovanovitch, and the subsequent gas deal for fun and profit. The best denial is that his rights to due process are being ignored, or that the impeachment is an attempt to swing the 2020 election.
No matter & whatever, There's enough there to remove him from office and public opinion is at about 51% to impeach and remove him from office. Publiv opinion is the thing that will let impeachment happen. It does not appear that the Republicans will ever show any backbone and take country first as a their sworn oath and be anywhere close to honest about Trump's illegal doings and his insufficiency for office. One thing that got the attention of the R's is the kowtowing to Turkey's Erdogan and the abandonment to slaughter of our Kurdish allies in the overthrow of ISIS. A couple of R's have been vocal over that singular situation.
Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post had a few things to say about the "cowardice" of the GOP in being honest about Trump - LINK
The impeachment is happening
Wait. What? Trump is greedy. Fer sure!. He even admits it. Here's an article by Catherine Rampell of the Washington Post that outlines Trump's most significant instances of personal greed over country first. LINK.
This laughing stock president would be funny is he wasn't so dangerous. That's dangerous to the earth, to the water, to the people of the US, and to the reputation of the United States. We're in a real pickle with this corrupt administration that includes Trump, William "The Walrus" Barr, Attorney General, and perhaps Mike Pompeo, Seceretary of State. Not to neglect tarring "Moscow" Mitch McConnell and his gang of immoral Senate Republicans that stand aside while Trump destroys this country in politics, and pollution so that the Republicans can get a few of their agenda items pushed though. This in spite of any cogent national budgeting or gun control or healthcare plans. The R's have allowed so much deviousness to go by that for them to accuse Trump of wrongdoing they would have to include themselves as guilty for letting so many other things goes to devastation.
Here's an impeachment summary from Rex Huppke of the Chicago Tribune wherein is outlined the simple facts, quid pro quo notwithstanding, that makes trump's guilt simple, observable, and actionable. And it is being acted on. The push back is happening from the guilty in the form of blathering denial, finger pointing, grandiose conspiracy schemes, backpedaling and just plain lying. LINK to the Article
This laughing stock president would be funny is he wasn't so dangerous. That's dangerous to the earth, to the water, to the people of the US, and to the reputation of the United States. We're in a real pickle with this corrupt administration that includes Trump, William "The Walrus" Barr, Attorney General, and perhaps Mike Pompeo, Seceretary of State. Not to neglect tarring "Moscow" Mitch McConnell and his gang of immoral Senate Republicans that stand aside while Trump destroys this country in politics, and pollution so that the Republicans can get a few of their agenda items pushed though. This in spite of any cogent national budgeting or gun control or healthcare plans. The R's have allowed so much deviousness to go by that for them to accuse Trump of wrongdoing they would have to include themselves as guilty for letting so many other things goes to devastation.
Here's an impeachment summary from Rex Huppke of the Chicago Tribune wherein is outlined the simple facts, quid pro quo notwithstanding, that makes trump's guilt simple, observable, and actionable. And it is being acted on. The push back is happening from the guilty in the form of blathering denial, finger pointing, grandiose conspiracy schemes, backpedaling and just plain lying. LINK to the Article
JHB "hypocritical"
It doesn't take much to call Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler hypocritical, but here it is in The Columbian. No doubt it. Editorial Page Editor Greg Jayne calls Beutler out for backing Trump's trade war and budget deficit increases, and rightly so. The woman is profoundly just a party marionette who attempts to act neutral with ineffective phone-in town halls (by invitation) and valueless job fairs and industry visits. read Greg's editorial - LINK.
Oh yes. Have you heard the very wonderful Carolyn Long is running again for the Washington 3rd Congressional District. She won Clark County last time over Beutler, but struggled with the other six counties in the district. She is the real deal - very well spoken and very well qualified - and is expected to win in 2020. It's very important to back her, finance her, and volunteer for her. Start NOW!
Oh yes. Have you heard the very wonderful Carolyn Long is running again for the Washington 3rd Congressional District. She won Clark County last time over Beutler, but struggled with the other six counties in the district. She is the real deal - very well spoken and very well qualified - and is expected to win in 2020. It's very important to back her, finance her, and volunteer for her. Start NOW!
The Columbian recommends candidates
The Columbian interviews virtually all candidates prior to ballots being mailed and provides their studied and guarded opinion on who is the better choice for the job at consideration.
So far this 2019 election cycle, they have made several recommendations:
No on I-976 - Constraining car tabs to $30 cuts out way too much very necessary revenue. It's an 'Eyeman' thing - LINK
Yes on R-88. It prevents "documented discrimination" in hiring. It is supported by Democrats. LINK
Yes on Senate Joint Resolution 8200. This keeps government running not only in the event of an "enemy attack" but in case of natural disaster like earthquake - LINK.
Yes on Vancouver Charter 7. This caps salaries - LINK
Kathy Decker over Lisa Messer for Vancouver School Board Position 4 - a close choice - LINK.
Kyle Sproul over Dale Rice for Vancouver School Board Position 1- LINK.
Divya Jain over incumbent Rachael Rogers for Evergreen School Board Position 4 - LINK
Sarah Fox over Jeanne Stewart for Vancouver City Council - LINK
Ty Stober over David Regan for Vancouver City Council. - LINK
Gary Medvigy over Adrian Cortes for County Council District 4. - LINK
Tracey Barrows over Chris Lewis for Vancouver School Board Pos 5 - LINK.
Erik Paulsen for Vancouver City Council - Versus the rather absent Maureen McGoldrick. LINK
Rob Perkins for Vancouver School Board - he is incumbent vs the very well qualified and "impressive" teacher; Bethany Rivard. LINK
Jack Burkman for Port Commissioner over Dan Barnes, who could also be adequate. LINK.
So far this 2019 election cycle, they have made several recommendations:
No on I-976 - Constraining car tabs to $30 cuts out way too much very necessary revenue. It's an 'Eyeman' thing - LINK
Yes on R-88. It prevents "documented discrimination" in hiring. It is supported by Democrats. LINK
Yes on Senate Joint Resolution 8200. This keeps government running not only in the event of an "enemy attack" but in case of natural disaster like earthquake - LINK.
Yes on Vancouver Charter 7. This caps salaries - LINK
Kathy Decker over Lisa Messer for Vancouver School Board Position 4 - a close choice - LINK.
Kyle Sproul over Dale Rice for Vancouver School Board Position 1- LINK.
Divya Jain over incumbent Rachael Rogers for Evergreen School Board Position 4 - LINK
Sarah Fox over Jeanne Stewart for Vancouver City Council - LINK
Ty Stober over David Regan for Vancouver City Council. - LINK
Gary Medvigy over Adrian Cortes for County Council District 4. - LINK
Tracey Barrows over Chris Lewis for Vancouver School Board Pos 5 - LINK.
Erik Paulsen for Vancouver City Council - Versus the rather absent Maureen McGoldrick. LINK
Rob Perkins for Vancouver School Board - he is incumbent vs the very well qualified and "impressive" teacher; Bethany Rivard. LINK
Jack Burkman for Port Commissioner over Dan Barnes, who could also be adequate. LINK.
Using Nan as an example for today
Do you know Nan Henriksen? Have you heard of Nan? She foresaw that Camas couldn't depend on a single industry to sustain itself. She became the mayor of Camas and proceeded to facilitate industrial growth and sustainability.
Greg Jayne, The Columbian Editorial Page Editor, cites Nan's accomplishments and on on to use her visionary capabilities and successful implementation as the kind of vision and effort needed to solve today's problems, especially climate change. Enjoy the piece at - LINK
Greg Jayne, The Columbian Editorial Page Editor, cites Nan's accomplishments and on on to use her visionary capabilities and successful implementation as the kind of vision and effort needed to solve today's problems, especially climate change. Enjoy the piece at - LINK
Clark County Forward event 09/26
Clark County Forward is a relatively new activity here in Clark County. Their mission is to talk with Democratic voters and get to know them, get to know their issues and get them to vote. The Regional Technical Director is Colin Peddicord.
The Kickoff Event is a way for folks to get to know what this group is all about and to see that their efforts will assist in encouraging voting and in getting the best people elected in Clark County.
Hamburgs and hot dogs will be served, and beer and wine available, at the following:
The Kickoff Event is a way for folks to get to know what this group is all about and to see that their efforts will assist in encouraging voting and in getting the best people elected in Clark County.
Hamburgs and hot dogs will be served, and beer and wine available, at the following:
CLARK COUNTY FORWARD
KICK OFF EVENT
IAFF Local 452 (Firefighters Union Hall)
2807 NW Fruit valley Road - MAP
Vancouver WA
5:30-7:00 PM
KICK OFF EVENT
IAFF Local 452 (Firefighters Union Hall)
2807 NW Fruit valley Road - MAP
Vancouver WA
5:30-7:00 PM
Trust Trump? - No way!
Dana Milbank of the Washington Post Writers Group cites instance after instance where Trump has backpedaled on a statement AND denied ever saying it. MIlbank posits that it may be old age forgetfulness, or that he misrepresents past statements to get [himself] out of trouble. It['s easier to belioeve the latter - that he just lies about things. Or it's possible he thrives on chaos where no one knows what his true feelings or directions are so he retains control and keeps everyone off kilter and ineffective. Read the piece at - LINK
Trump diverting $3.6 billion from military to Wall
Update: A television report 09/20/19 indicated Trump was planning to take a second sum from the military to the tune of another $3.6 billion.
This is all money that was approved by Congress in its budget administration function. These dollars are taken from projects that need doing. One in particular is adding safety and protection to the Washington State submarine base in Bangor WA just NW of Seattle.
This is all money that was approved by Congress in its budget administration function. These dollars are taken from projects that need doing. One in particular is adding safety and protection to the Washington State submarine base in Bangor WA just NW of Seattle.
The Columbian editorial of Sunday 09/15/19 says clearly that the Trump plan to fund his ego wall with $3.6 billion dollars taken out of the pentagon military budget is wrong and must be opposed. Congress sets the budget, not the president. That money was allocated for construction projects all over the country and the world to build piers, schools, and do naval ship maintenance, to name a few. Trump is "dictatorial" and the congress is "shameful". Read the piece at - LINK
Trump pocketing tax dollars
Are you keeping up on the Trump emoluments violations? Trump suggests the G7 be held at his resort. Air Force planes are doing refueling stops at a Scottish airport adjacent to his failing Turnberry resort. Pence stayed on the opposite side of Ireland in a Trump resort an d commuted to Dublin for meetings. Attorney General Barr is throwing a $30,000 birthday party at the DC Trump hotel. Here's a little graphic to describe those situations:
Herrera-Beutler wrong on trade war
The Columbian editorial by Greg Jayne (Sun 09/15/19) takes off after the rising national debt, and after Congresswoman Herrera Beutler's "hypocritical acquiescence over Trump's economic policy. On the trade war, she's waiting to see what he does and "watching to see what I can do to mitigate the impacts". Uhoh, wrong side of the issue , Jaime. It calls for proactive action. Read the oped at - LINK
This is way too similar to Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell's saying he can't act on gun control until he knows what the president wants. Again, the tail is wagging the dog.
When George W. Bush was president it felt like the country was going to hell. Now it feels like we have gone there.
This is way too similar to Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell's saying he can't act on gun control until he knows what the president wants. Again, the tail is wagging the dog.
When George W. Bush was president it felt like the country was going to hell. Now it feels like we have gone there.
Trump re-elected?!
Seeing trump in the White House for another four years is a terrifying thought. At this point six out of ten voters are trying to ignore the daily lies, grifts, and horror stories and are waiting for November 2020 when they expect he will be gone. But how did he get there? Who supports him? Roughly 40% of voters seem to like his policies. They don't seem to care that he's taking the citizens' tax dollars away from worthwhile projects to needlessly build the southern ego wall. Nor do they dislike his horrible treatment of the immigrants of color from the southern countries. Nor do they seem to mind his snarky bigotry toward non-whites. Nor do they mind their tax dollars going into his personal pocket from forced uses of his hostelry like Mar-a-Lago, Turnberry, Doonebeg, or DC venues.
Diligence and VOTING are tantamount in ousting this sham of a president. Anne McFeatters of Tribune News Service sums it up nicely at - LINK
Diligence and VOTING are tantamount in ousting this sham of a president. Anne McFeatters of Tribune News Service sums it up nicely at - LINK
Refuel Air Force planes to richen Trump
Trump owns a golf resort in Scotland called Turnberry. It is very unprofitable. The closest airport is about 30 miles away and also is a money loser, to the extent that the owners were going to shed it. Through some form of communication yet to be determined, the large C-17 Globemaster transport planes that fly from the US to resupply bases in Kuwait have begun landing at this private Scottish airport and refueling their 35,000 gallon tanks at commercial prices. While there, the crews go to the Trump hotel and spend more government money. This little airport has taken in an additional $11 mil since this started.
The planes had always refueled at US bases in Germany or Spain where they refueled with less expensive fuel and stayed at military accommodations. This activity can only be construed as a violation of the constitutional emoluments clause which makes it illegal for a president to make financial gain from his office. Read more at - LINK
The planes had always refueled at US bases in Germany or Spain where they refueled with less expensive fuel and stayed at military accommodations. This activity can only be construed as a violation of the constitutional emoluments clause which makes it illegal for a president to make financial gain from his office. Read more at - LINK
Trump = 12,000 lies
The Columbian's Greg Jayne expounds on President Trump's inablity to be honest. It's so bad that nothing Trump says can be believed. Even if he says he'll do something one day, he may take it back the next. The US Citizenry and the world have grown tired and inured to his ridiculous boasts. Sometimes h=his staff tries to cover for him, other times they rat him out. Read Greg at LINK
Perfectly Ugly
Dave Reichert running for WA Gov?
Dave Reichert (R) was 8th CD congressman until he retired in 2017. Kim Shrier (D) won the position over Dino Rossi in 2018. reichert is now considering a run for the governor's seat. Read the article - LINK.
Nirvana founder Novoselic is Gray's River WA grange leader
Krist Novoselic and accordion in Giants in the Trees
Krist Novoselic founded Nirvana with Curt Cobain to great success. Krist was active in the WA State Democratic Party around 2009 and attended the Clark County Democrats Annual fundraiser and Dinner at the County Fairgrounds Event Center that year. He was well received. Congressman Brian Baird and DNC Chair Governor Howard Dean had their pictures taken with Krist at the dinner.
Krist is still active in his community and still making music. Check out his current activities at - LINK.
Krist is still active in his community and still making music. Check out his current activities at - LINK.
Farmer's tipping point is fuel ethanol
The farmer's haven't protested a large amount over the loss of soybean sales due to the China tariffs Perhaps like this Iowan they felt it was a necessary long-term solution to balance the trade deficit. But when Trump showed favoritism to 31 oil refineries by letting them forgo the addition of ethanol from corn to their gasoline, the indignation rose. About 40% of the nations corn crop goes into fuel ethanol. The China soybean war is looked on as a long game, but reasonable. The ethanol decision is deemed liking the oil companies better than the farmer. Of course, you'll remember that ethanol was added to gas to make a burn cleaner and was a part of the Clean Air Act. Read the article - LINK.
Can't lose weight like you used to?
This article from The Atlantic says to stay the same weight nowadays, one must eat less than one did in the 1980's to stay low. Why? They cite possible causes: chemicals, hormones in meat, and changing gut bacteria. It's too believable. There are chemicals everywhere altering our bodies from the inside and there's global warming killing us from the outside. It's all about profit - lot's of it. Read the article - LINK
Inslee withdraws, and runs, with dignity
Credit: David Horsey, Seattle Times
WA Governor Jay Inslee is pretty cool. He has withdrawn from the Presidential Primary race with dignity and without doing anything detrimental to himself, the campaign, or any office. He left a legacy of heightened awareness about climate change which is being appropriately picked up by the more popular candidates as a salient issue, particularly by Sen Bernie Sanders.
The Columbian editorialized 08/26/19 about Inslee's withdrawal legacy, and were complimentary to our Governor. Jay's Gold Standard climate change revocation plan is "well-reasoned.well-informed". Read the piece at - LINK.
Now we can keep our impressive Governor Inslee.
The Columbian editorialized 08/26/19 about Inslee's withdrawal legacy, and were complimentary to our Governor. Jay's Gold Standard climate change revocation plan is "well-reasoned.well-informed". Read the piece at - LINK.
Now we can keep our impressive Governor Inslee.
Trump diagnosed "psychotic-like"
A psychiatrist who has followed Trump and his idiosyncrasies since the campaign is reporting again on trump be unbalanced, and increasingly so. He notes that Trump has now referred to himself as the "chosen one", a term usually used to reference the Messiah. Read the piece - LINK
A good synopsis of US economy
Here's a little analysis of where we are with the US economy. It seems that opposing forces are at play by the Trump administration - they are significantly raising the amount we owe in the national debt, and they are significantly reducing the amount of money collected to run the government through tax cuts to corporations and wealthy individuals. Catch up via this article - LINK
Jay Inslee withdraws with honor...to run!
Washington Governor Jay Inslee, running for US President as the Climate Change Candidate, has withdrawn from that race. He made his announcement Wednesday on the MSNBC news show; The Rachel Maddow Show. He was very positive and dignified and received statements honoring his perseverance and sense of issues from newscasters and other presidential candidates.
Jay announced Thursday that he will seek a third term as the Governor of Washington. He is well supported in that regard. Some who would have run for Governor are on record as stepping aside if Jay runs. Similarly, WA Attorney General Bob Ferguson has said he will run for Attorney General in support of Jay, and other attorney general opponents will step aside.
Jay has certainly successfully promoted the need to combat climate change. He has raised awareness for climate change and will work with the current presidential candidates to bolster their understanding of the urgent climate problem.
Jay announced Thursday that he will seek a third term as the Governor of Washington. He is well supported in that regard. Some who would have run for Governor are on record as stepping aside if Jay runs. Similarly, WA Attorney General Bob Ferguson has said he will run for Attorney General in support of Jay, and other attorney general opponents will step aside.
Jay has certainly successfully promoted the need to combat climate change. He has raised awareness for climate change and will work with the current presidential candidates to bolster their understanding of the urgent climate problem.
Trump on no gun control
The statistic about gun deaths in America is pretty clear - we are the only modern country with rampant gun deaths especially mass slayings, and the distinguishing differenc in us and the other countries is the huge numer of guns per person in this country. Other countries have the same mental health problems as us but do not have mass killings. It's time to disarm. Trump spoke out for better background checks soon after the Dayton OH and El Paso shootings, but as of Tuesday, just 18 days later, he backpedaled saying the US already has "very, very strong background checks". He cited his supporters love for the Second Amendment as the cause for the reversal.
Trump - "...recession...? OK?"
Trump continues to surpass himself. On Tuesday he was interviewed about his tariff policies on China and their effect on the US economy. He acknowledged the tariffs could cause economic pain or even a recession but that it had to be done. "Somebody had to take China on", he says. He believes, probably correctly, that a weakening US economy will weaken his chance for re-election. So where he has not admitted before that the tariffs may hurt US citizens, he is now acknowledging that they might be harmful.
Many market observers report that a recession is likely. Tariffs are a factor as is the longetivity of the recovery which started under Obama and has continued with influence by Trump until lately with the tariffs. Read the article and all Trump's quotes at - LINK
Many market observers report that a recession is likely. Tariffs are a factor as is the longetivity of the recovery which started under Obama and has continued with influence by Trump until lately with the tariffs. Read the article and all Trump's quotes at - LINK
Trump's tariffs a problem
.The farmers are being hurt by the tariffs with China because China isn't buying our crops, soybeans in particular. Trump says the tariffs do not hurt consumers, but every analyst says they do. In fact, Trump said last week, he was delaying additional tariffs on China until after the Christmas buying season, saying "in case tariffs have an impact". There the double-speak is revealed. Whimsical ploicies is his norm and the volatility of the stock market lately reflects this. It affects how people spend money and plan to spend money. It is widely accepted that the currently good US economy started on a rise in Obama's tenure and has continued since without any real influence by Trump. Market indicators lately say a recession is coming. Admittedly the predictors are not finite or perfectly accurate, but market volatility and withholding of investment dollars are mostly emotional responses to whispers about instability and recession. Such talk unnerves buyers and investors and the economy stumbles. The stage is set through Trump's wooing of dictators, domestic terrorism support, whimsical policies, and government by Tweet that confidence here and abroad is sinking.
Bernie Sanders' day in the sun is past
Froma Harrop of Creators.com clarifies the validity of some Bernie Sanders complaints about how the media, particularly the Washington Post, covers, or doesn't cover, him. She points out that his big moment in life was 2016 when he ran against Hillary Clinton. Bernie has brought his 10-points to the fore, however, with the result that Hillary moved left, and now Elizabeth Warren is touting Bernies' platform. She does it in a way that is much more friendly and somehow feels more doable than Bernie. Read the piece at - LINK
Kevin Siers cartoon: Trump’s teleprompter plea for unity falls flat
This lightly veiled dig references Trump's Teleprompter speech on Monday 08/05/19 after the El Paso and Dayton massacres. That speech verbally, but unemotionally, called for "unity", but the Tweets that day were the same braggadocio and diatribes against critics, like Beto O'Rourke. He continues to dog whistle hatred for brown people and to make that a center-point of his campaign, despite what he might flatly utter in a speech.
Nobody listens to Trump anymore
David Frum, staff reporter for The Atlantic, doesn't like Trump and his machinations. He reports that Trump "shames and debases the office every day". Trump's over-the-top statements are so bizarre that people shrug them off - and wait for a change. And while he makes a worldwide fool of the US daily, he keeps us on the brink of war and recession. Read the editorial at - LINK
Trump is 'the environment'
George Will, columnist for the Washington Post, says Trump is responsible for today's US turmoil. Will quotes Eric Hoffer, American writer and philosopher, that "malice enhances the penetrating power of and idea or opinion", and "rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength". Malice and rudeness are the methods Trump uses to make his points, along with a few dog whistles. The listener is too often inclined to believe Trump's sentiments and seeming direction are guideposts for antisocial behavior. Read the piece at - LINK
It's past time to talk about guns
Greg Jayne, editorial page editor of The Columbian, asks when is the time to talk about gun control if not now. He points out that "the United States is the only country where mass shootings are essentially a daily occurrence". Every other country has mental health problems and video game availability, but none have the overwhelming number of guns per citizen that the US has. He says Herrera Beutler has no interest in banning assault weapons. Read the article at - LINK
Must have the Senate
Mitch McConnell, federal senate leader, is an obstructionist. For meaningful legislation to be passed (gun laws, election protection), he has to go. Eugene Robinson of the Miami Herald has some suggestions - LINK
NRA to Trump >$30,000,000
The Associated Press did a little study on the NRA recently. You remember the National Rifle Association - they used to teach gun safety to kids. Now they encourage owning guns that contribute to school shootings. They are a powerful lobby and have Trump's ear admittedly. The attached article discusses their rather odd CEO, who brought back assault weapons after they were banned. The article notes the NRA contributed $30 million to Trump's campaign. Read the piece at - LINK
Mental health, video games not shooting cause
Here's a factual article by William Wan and Lindsay Bever of the Washington Post that says only about 25% of massacre shooters have mental illness, and that video games are not a problem. Gun availability in the light of resentful thinking or nedd for infamy or narcissism is the tie-in. "Gun access" is what needs to be prevented as is done in other civilized countries. Especially gun access to military grades weapons. In Dayton the shooter fired "41 shots in less than 30 seconds", a speed which was enabled by having a military weapon. Read the WaPo article - LINK
Trump said Monday that “mental illness and hatred pulls the trigger, not the gun”. Even if this were true, which the above says it's not, then elimination of "the gun" would still prevent the act of atrocity. No other civilized country has this problem. Why do we put up with it?
Trump said Monday that “mental illness and hatred pulls the trigger, not the gun”. Even if this were true, which the above says it's not, then elimination of "the gun" would still prevent the act of atrocity. No other civilized country has this problem. Why do we put up with it?
Trump on gun violence
The first weekend of August 2019 was particularly violent with explosive shootings in both El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio. Trump is felt by many to be stoking the fires of domestic terrorism with his inflammatory rhetoric about "fine" racists in Charlottesville, and chants with his followers. He made a speech after the terrible weekend about gun violence prevention through typical R techniques like mental health treatment and violent video games, and denounced white supremacy in a way. But there's no substance to these remarks and the accompanying New York Times article discusses how iterative the process was to finally get him to offer a fairly comprehensive speech. At one point Trump linked gun violence to immigration, somehow. Read the well done article at - LINK.
White bigotry successful?
How will people you know respond to Trump's fear-mongering and race-baiting?
Leonard Pitts of the Miami Herald reminds us of George Wallace and other politicians who successfully used bigotry by whites to be elected. If you're woke, it is hard to picture how powerful this tactic can be. If you are around some pretty 'average' folk, and listen, you can see it is a surprisingly useful, and frighteningly successful, tactic. Read the piece - LINK
Leonard Pitts of the Miami Herald reminds us of George Wallace and other politicians who successfully used bigotry by whites to be elected. If you're woke, it is hard to picture how powerful this tactic can be. If you are around some pretty 'average' folk, and listen, you can see it is a surprisingly useful, and frighteningly successful, tactic. Read the piece - LINK
'Country first' is gone
Leonard Pitts of the Miami Herald points out that the inclination to do the right thing for people over politics is passe. The new paradigm is scary and intolerable - Read the piece at - LINK.
Too much inattention
Here's a little piece by Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post. She pulls no punches about Trump and his misdeeds. Similarly she warns US citizens to pay attention - select a nominee that can beat Trump or lose democracy. - LINK
Local Election
Clark County Elections has posted a "Notice of Primary and Special Election", Tuesday August 06, 2019.
The voter registration deadlines are 5:00 PM Monday July 29, 2019 for on-line and mail registrations.
In-person registration may take place at the Elections Office up to August 06, 2019 at 8:00 PM.
The Columbian has recommended the following candidates so far:
Vancouver City Council Pos. 2: Erik Paulsen
Vancouver City Council, Pos 6: Diana Perez and Paul Montague
Vancouver School Board, Pos. 1: Dale Rice and Kyle Sproul, with a nod to Caressa Milgrove
Vancouver School Board Pos. 5: Tracie Barrows and Chris Lewis
Vote... early and often.
The voter registration deadlines are 5:00 PM Monday July 29, 2019 for on-line and mail registrations.
In-person registration may take place at the Elections Office up to August 06, 2019 at 8:00 PM.
The Columbian has recommended the following candidates so far:
Vancouver City Council Pos. 2: Erik Paulsen
Vancouver City Council, Pos 6: Diana Perez and Paul Montague
Vancouver School Board, Pos. 1: Dale Rice and Kyle Sproul, with a nod to Caressa Milgrove
Vancouver School Board Pos. 5: Tracie Barrows and Chris Lewis
Vote... early and often.
Racism abounds
The horror show is in full swing. Trump has people chanting racist calls about congresswomen. We all remember his respect for the white supremacists in Charlottesville.
The slaves were freed in 1865. The Civil Rights Act was enacted in 1964. All to the good and all to the point of understanding and recognizing that all men are created equal.
Unless you are a native American, you have migrant blood in your veins and you're part of the melting pot. But you may not be of color.
This Trump racism seems to be a campaign ploy to energize his base, much like cruelty to asylum seekers at the Southern border is intended to do. One hears that the some R's reject the racist direction but the R party never makes a statement. They like the fear bred by inferring that 'coastals', Democrats, will ruin the country. Check out Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post on Republican racism - LINK
The two words to denigrate Democrats in the 2020 elections are "Socialists", and "Send her back". We have to prove that socialism is not communism, and that we already have huge beneficial socialist programs, not the least of which is the military, followed by tax-fed police and fire.
What do we do to combat racism? We have to not allow it. Over the past 50 years, racism has been driven down, not truly eliminated, but at least the conversation was, to the largest part, politically correct. In the last two years, that political correctness has been washed away and it is okay to attack, slur, and assail another person for their race and/or color.
This is not the America of the our forefathers and our constitution.
The slaves were freed in 1865. The Civil Rights Act was enacted in 1964. All to the good and all to the point of understanding and recognizing that all men are created equal.
Unless you are a native American, you have migrant blood in your veins and you're part of the melting pot. But you may not be of color.
This Trump racism seems to be a campaign ploy to energize his base, much like cruelty to asylum seekers at the Southern border is intended to do. One hears that the some R's reject the racist direction but the R party never makes a statement. They like the fear bred by inferring that 'coastals', Democrats, will ruin the country. Check out Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post on Republican racism - LINK
The two words to denigrate Democrats in the 2020 elections are "Socialists", and "Send her back". We have to prove that socialism is not communism, and that we already have huge beneficial socialist programs, not the least of which is the military, followed by tax-fed police and fire.
What do we do to combat racism? We have to not allow it. Over the past 50 years, racism has been driven down, not truly eliminated, but at least the conversation was, to the largest part, politically correct. In the last two years, that political correctness has been washed away and it is okay to attack, slur, and assail another person for their race and/or color.
This is not the America of the our forefathers and our constitution.
Call him "ineffective"
He's calling us socialists and obstructionists and the cause of the border debacle. We call him racist and moronic and a liar. Strong argumentative words.
Let's call him "Ineffective". That label will be like nails on a blackboard to him. This was a suggestion by a panelist on CNN the other day. Try it on some people. The reaction has been good.
"Trump is 'ineffective'".
Let's call him "Ineffective". That label will be like nails on a blackboard to him. This was a suggestion by a panelist on CNN the other day. Try it on some people. The reaction has been good.
"Trump is 'ineffective'".
